Lemaire, Marianne. – Les sillons de la souffrance
Lemaire, Marianne. – Les sillons de la souffrance. Représentations du travail en pays sénoufo (Côte d’Ivoire). Paris, CNRS Éditions-Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme, 2009, 254 p., bibl., gloss.
1Les sillons de la souffrance is a richly documented ethnography that focuses on the range of activities and meanings associated with the word faliwi among the Tyebara, a Senufo sub-group in the region of Korhogo in Côte-d’Ivoire. As Lemaire points out, faliwi can only very approximately be translated as “work”. Some activities which we would consider “work”, such as food preparation, are not considered faliwi, which can however include ritual activities which do not fall into the category of “work”. In all cases, faliwi implies some form of suffering, whether physical or moral–the physical suffering of cultivating a field with a hoe, or the moral suffering of mourning and funeral ritual.
2The paradigmatic form of faliwi is (primarily but not exclusively male) agricultural labor. The value of such labor is embodied in the figure of the tegbanwi, the champion cultivator in the village, the young man who in a competition can hoe a furrow fastest and straightest and whose yam mounds are the stoutest and largest. In inter-village contexts, when for example a party from the prospective groom’s village is preparing a field for his future in-laws, the tegbanwi of each village competes against the other. The opposite of the tegbanwi is the kanwolowi, one who lags behind, not through laziness but from a disinterest in competition. (Paradoxically, Lemaire points out, the tegbanwi is often too involved in competition to tend his own fields properly, while the kanwolowi is generally a successful farmer). The chapter on work and music is particularly successful in its rich depiction of the fundamental ambivalence of Senufo values about work. Lemaire analyzes both the texts of women’s songs and the men’s xylophone melodies which, by reproducing the tonal structure of utterances, reproduce a coded text. Such texts may encourage rivalry and exalt the tegbanwi, but they may also deprecate them and suggest that rivalry has its costs and its limits.
3Half the book is devoted, not to agricultural but to ritual work, as well as ritual prohibitions on work : an individual’s personal spirit’s “market day”, when he or she may not labor in the fields, but also broader prohibitions, particularly those associated with the sandogi society, which may extend to the interdiction of all agricultural labor–an interdiction particularly likely among men to afflict a tegbanwi. The book concludes with the work of the so-called secret societies, the men’s poro but especially the sandogi, whose members are on the contrary mostly women. Indeed, differences in the gendered experience of “work” are a leitmotif throughout the book, with Lemaire suggesting that, very broadly but hardly in any absolute sense, men’s work is more likely to involve physical suffering, and women’s work moral suffering, a theme reflected as well in their songs.
4Perhaps the most startling feature of this book about “work” is its near total silence on the subject of the economy. In passing, the reader may glean that the cultivation of rice has tended to supplant millet, or learn that the only songs with words sung by men are performed when outsiders come to appraise cotton for purchase. These songs which literally deprecate women, are thinly veiled insults aimed at the appraisers who systematically assess the cotton as inferior in order to purchase it at less than its value. Indeed, Lemaire’s central contention is that the values embodied in faliwi, however gendered and ambivalent, are essentially anti-economic. Unfortunately, such a blanket portrayal of core Senufo values as “uneconomic” mirrors the very colonial stereotypes of the Senufo which she so eloquently critiques at the outset of the book. The progressive adoption of cotton and, to an important extent, rice as cash crops, as one can infer only by reading in between the lines of the book, belie any such characterization. By radically dichotomizing “work” and economy, Lemaire ultimately succeeds in removing the Senufo from history, in spite of her real and sincere attempts to take history into account. Even so, this remains a very sensitive and perceptive account of the cultural meanings of agricultural and ritual labor among the Tyebara.
Pour citer cet article
Robert Launay, « Lemaire, Marianne. – Les sillons de la souffrance », Cahiers d’études africaines [En ligne], 208 | 2012, mis en ligne le 31 octobre 2012, consulté le 08 février 2016. URL : http://etudesafricaines.revues.org/14434Haut de page
© Cahiers d’Études africainesHaut de page